B shah v. presiding officer

Author: ymkz

August undefined, 2024

WebDec 14, 2024 · In B Shah v Presiding Officer, AIR 1978 SC 12 case, Labour Court applied the rule of beneficial construction in construing section 5 of the Maternity … WebIts object is to secure proper working conditions & penalties for failure to provide such conditions are merely incidental to the object. There is no need to construe the Act restrictively, though equally there is no need to extend it beyond its natural meaning B. Shah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court The court applied the beneficent rule of ...

B. Shah Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore & Ors …

WebIn the landmark case of B Shah v Presiding Officer, Labour Court, court applied beneficent rule of construction in construing section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, … WebB.Shah Vs. Presiding Officer,Labour court Case 1978 IMP. LEADING CASE LABOUR LAWS LLB Little Legal Helper! 13.5K subscribers Subscribe 1.5K views 2 years ago … dr jerome hong dupage medical group

B. Shah vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court, ... on 12 October, 1977

WebB. Shah V. Presiding Officer, A.I.R. 1978 S. C. 12. 9[5-A. Continuance of payment of maternity benefit in certain cases. -- Every woman entitled to the payment of … WebMr Bhat has, on the other hand, urged that the scheme of Section 5 of the Act clearly indicates that a woman worker who expects delivery has to be paid maternity benefit for … WebHere,"in a hospital" only applies to doctors and not to firemen or policemen. fBENEFITIAL LEGISLATION “Salus Populi Suprema Lex” that is “the welfare of the people is the supreme law”. The object of every legislation is to advance public welfare. Justice and reason constituted the great general legislative Intent In every piece of ... dr jerome horowitz cardiology

Ram Bahadur Thakur (P) Ltd. vs Chief Inspector Of Plantations …

International Women

WebSupreme Court of India, B. Shah v. Presiding Officer of the Labour Court, 12 October 1977, Case No. 1978 AIR 12 1978 SCR (1) 701 Country : India Subject: Maternity … WebDec 14, 2024 · In B Shah v Presiding Officer, AIR 1978 SC 12 case, Labour Court applied the rule of beneficial construction in construing section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, … dr. jerome horwitz cardiologyWebJan 30, 2012 · The Supreme Court vide its judgment in B. Shah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore [1977 (4) SCC 384] dealt with the interpretation of the maternity benefit available to the daily wage workers and set the tone for interpreting the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 [for short, ‘M.B Act’]. The following passage found in ... dr jerome horwitz cherry hill nj

"WebB. SHAH Vs PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, COIMBATORE & ORS. Vs. RESPONDENT: PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, COIMBATORE & ORS. … " - B shah v. presiding officer

B shah v. presiding officer

Payment of Gratuity to contract labours in India - iPleaders

WebAggrieved by this decision. the respondent filed an appeal under cl. 15 of the Letters Patent and the Division Bench set aside the orders of the single Judge. Dismissing the appeal by special leave, the Court, B. Shah Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore & Ors [1977] INSC 198 (12 October 1977) WebAug 9, 2006 · v. Presiding Officer, S... By this writ petition, petitioner No. 1 - employer and petitioner No. 2 - Headmaster/Chief Executive Officer has challenged the judgment dated 4-4-1994 passed by the School Tribunal in Appeal No. 75 of 1993-A holding that departmental enquiry conducted by the petitioners against present respondent No. 2 was not in ...

Did you know?

Web16.08.2024 passed by respondent No.1 - Presiding Officer of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens' Tribunal (for short 'Tribunal'). 1.3. ii. records and proceedings from the Respondent No.1 and after perusing the legality and propriety of … WebAug 9, 2006 · He relies upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Bhagirathi Jena v. Board of Directors, O.S.F.C, reported at (1999) 3 SCC 666, to …

WebMaternity Benefit Act - Shah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court Coimbatore (1978) o Municipal - Studocu N Shanmukh G table of contents introduction an overview of the … WebFeb 9, 2024 · Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore and others: The question before the court was that whether Sundays are to be included in …

WebB. Shah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court. This case was in relation to section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, with respect to the amount of wages to be given to a mother [Under the Act, wages are to be paid to an expecting mother for the days she is on leave due to pregnancy]. The question was whether WebMar 8, 2000 · The Maternity Benefit Act, 96, was enacted on 2.2.96, to regulate the employment of women in certain establishments for certain period, before and after child birth. Section 5 provides ...right to payment of maternity benefit. Section 5 (3) provides for twelve weeks payment. 5.

WebSmith, 559 U.S. 314 (2010) BERGHUIS, WARDEN v. SMITH. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit. No. 08–1402. Argued January 20, 2010—Decided …

WebPETITIONER:B. SHAHVs. RESPONDENT:PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, COIMBATORE & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT12/10/1977BENCH:SINGH, JASWANTBENCH:SINGH, JASWANTKRISHNAIYER, V.R.CITATION: 1978 AIR 12 … dr. jerome lightbourne bahamasWebJudge Shah is the author of three Georgia pocketbooks: The Code Criminal, The Code Civil and The Code Evidence. The Code is currently published by MyCLE. Judge Shah is a … dr jerome peters ophthalmologyWeb1. B. Shah vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court, 1978 AIR 12 2. Ram Bahadur Thakur (P) Ltd. vs Chief Inspector Of Plantations, (1989) IILLJ 20 Ker (Kerala High Court) 3. Mrs. Bharti Gupta vs Rail India Technical And Economical Services Ltd. 2005 (84) DRJ 53 Continuance of payment of maternity benefit in certain cases- Section- 5A dr jerome mcmahon dds cincinnati ohioWebApr 12, 2024 · Goradia, Advocates and Mr. Ravi Vijay Ramaiya, CA i/b Shah & Ramaiya, Chartered Accountants for the Appellant. Mr. Sumit Rai, Advocate with Mr. Abhiraj Arora, Mr. Shourya Tanay, Ms. Misbah Dada, Mr. Deepanshu Agarwal, Advocates i/b ELP for the Respondent. ... Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member 11.04.2024 … dr jerome skelly south bend indianaWebB.Shah v. Presiding officer, Labour Court, Regarding Construction of S. 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. 2.Spring Meadows Hospital v,. Harjol Ahluwalia, JT 1998 (2) SC 620. Consumer Protection Act. 3. dr. jerome scherer butler health systemWebJun 9, 2008 · 4. The Supreme Court vide its judgment in B. Shah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore. 1977 2 LLN 606., dealt with the interpretation of the maternity benefit available to the daily wage workers and set the tone for interpreting the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 (for short, ‘M.B Act’). The following passage found ... dr jerome williams cardiologist charlotte ncWebJan 31, 2024 · “ In B. Shah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore [23], the doctrine of, beneficial construction was conclusively and comprehensively discussed in … dr. jerome smith dentist in lafayette la